Home
ShowsBefore You GoBulletin BoardContactAboutSearch
Show and Features |
Culture Watch | Question of the Week | Letters of the Week |
Traveler's Aid | Library | Host's View
 

 

Carry-On Baggage Proposals

The discussions regarding carry-on luggage problems and the generally dysfunctional proposed "solutions are becoming common both in the newspapers and on The Savvy Traveler. What I am about to describe is common to both professional photographers and serious amateurs, of which I am one.

The airlines have long held that one should not pack film in checked baggage. This is absolutely even more true today as new checked baggage security devices are being installed. The film will be ruined. However, carrying just 100 rolls of film in their little plastic canisters, but removed from their boxes, in lead lined bags still requires a small size duffle.

On extended photo vacations I might very well carry 15-20 pounds of equipment with an estimated value well over $5,000 which greatly exceeds standard baggage loss liability limits. For a variety of reasons it is neither feasible nor viable to check this equipment. Even the temporary misdirection of the equipment could ruin a vacation.

I am now potentially up to two carry-on bags, which exceeds the limits on some carriers, and will exceed the future limits on most carriers. I get around the problem by using a photo vest and photo coat which have large padded pockets in which the gear is carried, but I would prefer not to have to resort to this rather uncomfortable strategy.

Putting the sticky issue of what constitutes a woman's purse (I do not believe that whatever she calls a purse regardless of size should be so construed), why not charge extra for carry-on baggage? The charge would be levied at boarding with each piece having to have its own tag. The first piece (after the purse) would be $5, the second $10 and the third $20 with a limit of 3.

I would be satisfied paying some extra to ensure I could keep my valuable film and equipment with me without fearing a hassle, or without having to resort to surreptitious means (photo vest).

Alternatively or in addition to the above, the FAA and the airlines could have special categories of very valuable (photo equipment, film) or perishable items (film) for which waivers from super strict carry-on limitations could be obtained.

Maybe some on air discussions of some innovative solutions would help the industry arrive at viable acceptable solutions.

--John

 

{ Previous Letter | This Week's Index | Next Letter }

{ Main Letters Page }

American Public Media
American Public Media Home | Search | How to Listen
©2004 American Public Media |
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy